One of the areas that I am strongly passionate about
is Research and Development (R&D).
R & D leads to innovation. It
is no wander that in the early stages of setting up operational divisions for
SME Association of Zimbabwe (SMEAZ) in 2011, I instantly asked the CEO and
Chairman at the time, why their executive committee had not included an R &
D Committee. After all, if SMEs are the
engines of growth in a given economy; then why would R & D not be part of
that agenda? After, punting my defense
for R &D, as if I was defending my PhD thesis, the CEO graciously accepted
my proposal to have an R & D Committee; especially to support the Advocacy
& Lobby Committee and Market Development Committee. Why support these two committees? Well, what exactly would SMEs be advocating
and lobbying for if we as a sector do not take upon ourselves to provide scientifically
research-based studies to support 1) a specific policy design and
implementation that we would like to take to parliament; and 2) discovery of
new products to market to both existing markets or new market; aka finding our ‘Blue-Ocean.’
What is SMEAZ all about?
To summarize, the SMEAZ was founded by Farai Mutambanengwe
in the pursuit of providing support to SMEs in both the formal and informal
sectors in a centralized and structured manner.
In addition, for SMEs to start working in collaboration with each other to
improve value chain process’ within an
industry and/or sector as opposed working in individually and at odds with each
other in an informal sector where it is both uncompetitive and impedes
sustainable innovative products and services to market.
For more information about the various committees and
how you can volunteer your services, please visit: http://www.smeassociationzimbabwe.co.zw/index.php/contact-smeaz/smeaz-address .
Surely, SMEs don’t need
R&D; because they are running business’ they are already innovative,correct?
Studies have shown that small business ownerships does not translate to entrepreneurial capacity. Hence, that is why Zimbabwe can have approximately 90% of SMEs running formally and informally in the country but not making any meaningful economic impact to the country’s GDP and Innovation Management System (IMS).
Studies have shown that small business ownerships does not translate to entrepreneurial capacity. Hence, that is why Zimbabwe can have approximately 90% of SMEs running formally and informally in the country but not making any meaningful economic impact to the country’s GDP and Innovation Management System (IMS).
Therefore, it is my belief, that the primary purpose
of the R&D Committee is to gather a critical mass of first-class Zimbabwean
scientists and give them large enough grants on a continuing basis, as well as
sufficient infrastructure, to enable them to undertake meaningful
problem-solving R&D applied to industrial production that will lead to
really important results of economic growth. The sectors that would
require such investment in R&D are:
- Agriculture
- Manufacturing
- Mining
- Tourism
- Energy, Infrastructure and Transport
- Education/Services (There is a huge gap between what the market needs in terms of job requirement and what the Zimbabwean education system is producing).
So, if you received funding
for venture capitalists; international organizations and private sector; what are the benefits to the investor?
- Each outcome of the research should lead to a specific policy design and implementation. There-by, making an impact on institutional frameworks that affect the SME sector.
- Each outcome of the research should lead to specific product or service to market in Zimbabwe, that is both scalable and has a social rate of return NOT just a private rate of return to the society, businesses and government.
Conclusion
Whilst I commend the Government to an improvement on
the Industrial Development Policy (IDP) 2012 – 2016; I am still dis-heartened
by the fact that they are still not making R & D a priority in economic
growth of this country. This is
highlighted by the following statement:
Greater financial support for innovation and
technology is necessary in order to contribute to the national target of increasing
and sustaining Research and Development (R&D) expenditure to 2% of GDP. – IDP2012 - 2016 (2012)
Two per cent? The reason why
advanced economies are ahead of emerging market economies when it comes to
innovation is because their R & D expenditure is more than 20% of GDP. Thus, it has become a purpose-driven mission
to:
·
Identify any
institutions and organizations that will support R&D center(s) in Zimbabwe
for SME Development.
·
Pro-actively seek
donor fund allocation to R & D activities.
After
reading the IDP 2012 – 2016, it dawned on me that Zimbabwe’s issues run deeper
than the lack of innovation systems and the need to recapitalize key sectors. Though IDP mentions initiatives around ‘clustering’
a concept born by the famous economist Michael Porter (1990); the country’s
sectors continue to suffer from an inherited culture of closed innovation
system of self-sufficiency of individual firms and industries. This business model is at odds with the new
knowledge-based landscape of the twenty-first century. In essence, the R & D initiatives, seeks
to support policy makers and industry stakeholders to continuously provide operational
innovation management systems via various macro and microeconomic policies
including cluster policy design. This is critical to the re-birth of the Zimbabwean
economy 2012 and beyond!
Copyright @ 13 November 2012. BlogSpot by Tambu
Ndoro, Strategist & Innovation Expert at Hanga Consulting (PVT) Ltd, (2011). Visit www.hangaconsulting.com on Sustainability
Workshops: Social Entrepreneurship; Sustainable Marketing, Strategic Leadership
and Change and Innovation Management.
Suggested related readings from my blog NEW
CONSCIOUSNESS: